Musings on Photography

First Impressions

Posted in Blogroll, process by Paul Butzi on February 23, 2008

G9-080220-0477-Bw
Paul Lester has an interesting post on ‘working the subject’ up on his blog this morning, and it’s had me thinking all morning.

A brief excerpt:

The premise is that if you find a subject that calls your attention for some reason, make sure that you give it your attention. My implementation of it is that I don’t just shoot one or two shots and then move on. I work the shot. Try it from every conceivable angle that I can think of, even if I think it is silly.

I am, I admit, something of a wussy when it comes to ‘working the shot’, at least in the sense that Paul means in his post. I’ll make several related exposures, sure. But trying every conceivable angle? Once in a while, especially with closeups, I’ll go on a tear and try everything I can think of. But mostly, something catches my eye, I examine it for a while, and then I proceed to make the photo. Often, even for intimate landscapes, there just aren’t many choices for angle, and all but one are two are bad on the face of it.

I suspect this is a holdover from my view camera days, where if you tried to work every conceivable angle not only would you never make it to the end of the front walk, you’d succumb to exhaustion from continuously adjusting the tripod again and again.

It occurs to me, though, that I do something similar. It’s not ‘working the shot’ in the sense that I’m trying every conceivable angle. It’s more that when I do what I think of as ‘coming to grips with a spot’, I go back. I go back to that same spot, over and over and over.

There’s one spot in the valley, right next to a bridge where the road passes through a grove of trees. There’s nothing particularly scenic about that spot. I’m sure that Jeff Wall would call it an insignificant place. For reasons I can’t easily articulate I find myself there with the camera on the tripod, time and again. I could probably throw the camera and tripod in the Subaru, and the car could drive there on its own, like a horse heading home. And each time I come home, the photos are different. Different light, different vegetation, different sun position, different weather – it’s a wonderment that the very same place can have so many different faces. We tend to think of places as ‘one place’ but really they’re lots of different places that just happen to all coincide in space. Place is as much about time as it is about location.

Joshua Baer told me a story about his dad, the great landscape and architectural photographer Morley Baer. Joshua told me that he’d be somewhere with his dad, and his dad would look at something for a minute or two, and then announce “I think I need to do something about that,” which was apparently Morley Baer’s way of saying “I have to go make a photograph.” There are lots of places I visit or drive past, and I make a what I think of as mental Morley Baer note – “I need to come back here and do something about this.” The funny thing is that my list of places I need to do something about seems to grow but never shrink. I can’t remember ever visiting a spot and then thinking “Ok, now I’m done with this spot.”

Anyway, maybe I do ‘work the shot’, but I just tackle it in the time domain rather than the angle domain.

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Doug Stockdale said, on February 24, 2008 at 3:53 pm

    I am more in your camp than perhaps Pauls. My wife is constantly bugging me with the “you have already photographed that”, but I also find different light, etc just as you mention. I keep coming back to mine the location for more “gold”.

    And it seems over time, the reason for my interest in that location changes, and my resulting image(s) reflects that change in my interest.

  2. Paul Grecian said, on February 24, 2008 at 4:02 pm

    I to tend to work in the same location over and over as well. I feel comfortable there and that allows me to think and feel in a way I wouldn’t if I were anywhere else. When I really feel I need a change of place, I go somewhere else, but then soon I’m back to where I feel comfortable.

  3. paul said, on February 25, 2008 at 7:54 am

    I, too, work the same location many times; however, if I come upon something of particular interest then I might give it a good working over, too. There’s no right or wrong way to do it. There are just differences in approach and, Paul, your way is the right way … for you. 🙂

  4. […] on the end result, but on the approach, or the means. One of them by Paul Butzi, which you can read here, and the other by Paul Maxim, which you can read […]

  5. […] allows, you may vary the situation perhaps by returning at different times of the day or year as described by Paul Butzi. Or you may use a combination of […]


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: